Friday, August 24, 2018

Poetry and Medicine


            After attending the Poetry Competition organized by students of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) on Friday December 22, 2006, I developed a strong urge to propose to the concerned authorities of Tribhuvan University that they consider including poetry somewhere in the medical curricula. To some grey hairs, such a proposal might sound preposterous. However, to me this notion carried the weight of personal conviction because I had witnessed the zeal of medical students for poetic expressions, their capacity to relish poetry as pleasing and meaningful sound, and, above all, their ability to express their noble sentiments in a richly original and personal poetic language. This opened my eyes to the relationship between poetry and medicine.
            Earlier, I had explored the use of mathematics in literature in “The Numerical Rhizome” and noted the balance and symmetry of equations in both these fields that yielded aesthetic delights to the human mind. Now, I had begun to sense some sort of moral and humane relationship between medicine and poetry. Here was an area to explore.
            My mind went back to the year 1959 when my father, a terminally ill cancer patient, lay on a wooden bed in a small shed inside the precinct of Hare Ram Kunja. It was around this time that Dom Moraes wanted to meet him. We have a recollection of this meeting in Gone Away: An Indian Journal written by this poet of Indian origin. Devkota wanted to listen to the young man’s poetry even as he suffered the conflagration within his bowels. To some extent, poetry, which was his passion, helped him take his mind away from pain.
            I am sure that there are many other instances where a ward patient has found at least momentary relief from pain or depression through poetry. Poetry is not a mere luxury for those who can afford it; it is a sharing of joys and sorrows, of visions and fears, of life-truths that imagination fishes out of existence. Poetry makes a very powerful use of language. The impact of its brevity, its suggestion and its felt truth upon the heart leaves a lasting impression that is capable of changing attitudes and behaviour. Its rhythm can change a mood, its chanted repetitions can alleviate if not actually heal ailments of psychosomatic origin, its coded truth, acting as precedent, can ease the burden of a terminally ill patient or a chronic sufferer of some malaise who shares a similar condition.
Often, it is not only the terminally ill patient but also the disabled, the sick or the depressed that benefits from other people’s experience. It is easy to imagine the relief experienced by people who have just learned of their metabolic disorder when other diabetic patients, for example, tell them how they have learned to live with it for the last five or ten years. Such sharing can quite naturally strike a friendly relationship between such people on the basis of their similar physical condition. The blind and the deaf share their respective forums. The AIDS patient is consoled by the fact that s/he is not the sole person to suffer this condition. We alleviate our own suffering by sharing it with others and we alleviate the suffering of others by lovingly listening to what they have to say to us. This is why there is a whole category of literature of the disabled which has found a place in university curricula all over the world.
I need not repeat here that poetry, art and music have their own therapeutic values. Poetry is that chemical of the soul that can be blended with noble and enlightened feelings in the beaker of the heart where life constantly flows in and out. It is then linguistically encapsulated in its generic literary form. Diagnosis of an ailment relies more on the head than on the heart. Physics observes and decides even as chemistry cures. Diagnosis is a processing of empirical data in the head. The cure functions so subtly that physicians have to rely on its apparent symptoms to understand its inferred intracellular processes, which may even then be obscure to them. Poetry, too, works in subtle and invisible ways to nourish human sensibilities. Our fickle sensibilities are often benumbed and dehydrated, so to say, by force of habit, by repeated invasions of the ugly and the bad, and by uncritical ingestion of too much of general lies that float as rumuors in the public atmosphere.
What we all need is a regular re-invigoration of our sensibility. This is even more so especially in violent times like ours when uneducated responses to frustrations defy the sanctity of human life itself. On a more practical level, medical practitioners and, on a more spiritual level, poets are sworn into the promotion of life, not its destruction. Whenever the spirit and the act synchronize in the same individual, humankind wins yet another battle against the ugly and the bad. We have many battles to win.
And, what is the harm anyway if a course in the literature of the disabled, for instance, were offered in a curriculum for medicine? Do students of medicine have anything to lose by studying some literature that explains the physical, social, and psychological conditions of their patients? It will expose physicians to the perspectives of their patients and promote a better understanding that will lead to improved service of humanity.
Or, for that matter, a course in creative writing for students of medicine is not unimaginable. It can be offered as an optional paper for those that find it meaningful. After all, many medical practitioners all over the world have written poetry and other forms of literature. Some have even sacrificed their medical career and established themselves as excellent poets and writers. Humanity can be served in a hundred different ways, but poetry can be relished and produced by only those who keep alive the soothing flames of human sensibilities.

Thursday, December 28, 2006

Sunday, February 18, 2018

Padma Devkota

What Is Good Literature?[1]

I want to begin by thanking the Literary Association of Nepal (LAN) for giving me this pleasant and honorable task of lighting the inaugural lamp today on the occasion of its Annual Conference 2013. May the light of this lamp burn throughout the year! May it kindle in our hearts a love for good literature, a thirst for the pursuit happiness through knowledge and a desire to use that knowledge for the cultural enhancement of our nation if not of the whole world!

Personally, I have been associated with LAN since its inception in 1980 when Professor Durga Prasad Bhandari was the President, Professor Yugeshwar Verma its Vice-President, and Professor Shreedhar Lohani its Secretary. I have been a part of its vicissitudes and seen how it has risen again and again to meet its scholarly goals and its general objectives despite financial and other problems in addition to the initial lack of paper writers. I am well aware of the tensions and anxiety that forerun an event such as the one that we have just inaugurated today. This is why I must congratulate all of you, especially the members of the executive committee, for keeping alive what must not wither away or die. Literature, and especially the Humanities, is going through a difficult period in our universities especially because of the present phase of political transition from utter confusion to higher sense. Once the transition is complete, I am sure that Literature and the Humanities will be given all due respect and recognition in our universities. Any government that does not give due importance to the Humanities will naturally weaken itself through spiritual and ethical atrophy.

Good literature has the virtue of being universally understood as the most soul-searching human activity, which transcends mere material existence. It is only when literature is regarded as a consumable product that its social and utilitarian function begins to outweigh its symbolic significance, its aesthetic expressions and its spiritual resonance. It is then that ideological lessons tend to take over the so-called social uselessness of art and literature. It is true also that good literature fashions attitudes and ambitions of people who take to heart its concerns, cogitations, and cognitions of what a good life is or should be. However, good literature is never didactic like good ideological propaganda literature. Poetry and propaganda stand miles apart, but totalitarian regimes often benefit by mixing up these two in confused public heads. Good literature is suggestive, simple in its concerns for human welfare, beautiful in its expressions of simple events of ordinary life, truthful in its recordings of human conditions, apt in its expressions of human values that are generally acceptable, and always optimistic and positive in its vision of human societies and progress. Good literature is different from a good book. A good book is readable but what it offers is not necessarily true; it is entertaining but not necessarily realistic; it is popular but not necessarily profound in its insights into minds, societies and cultures. James Joyce’s Ulysses is a bad book, which very few people read; but it is good literature. Ann Rynd’s Atlas Shrugged is a good book which many people read but not necessarily good literature. Sometimes mere popularity seems to stand as a measuring rod of good literature as in the case of Harry Potter. Although all the seven volumes of this series make interesting reading, they neither offer fresh philosophic perspectives into human life and condition, nor record the lived history of human pain, fear, dream or hope. It is a good series to read for mere entertainment, not for serious statements or profound understandings concerning human life and society. However, I must also admit that it is an excellent sample of good children’s literature.
                Good, serious literature must necessarily stir our emotions and, thereby, lead us to reexamine our thoughts, attitudes and traditions. This is why literature also makes things happen in the world. Today’s conference, for instance focuses on one particular instance of injustice: violence against women, which is a global issue. The theme of this year’s International Women’s Day on March 8 is also violence against women and girls. Such violence, which takes place at home or in the public sphere, is only one example of injustice that gives rise to human suffering. Injustice and other similar inflictions of pain and suffering by human beings on other human beings or groups of people in the name of gender, race, religion, money, political power, etc. become the basic themes of literature. Injustice is one of the many problems of the human society against which poets and writers have been crying out since eons ago. This is what William Wordsworth bemoans when he writes: “And much it grieved my heart to think,/ What man has made of man.” And this is what Maya Angelou speaks out against so powerfully in “Still I Rise”:
You may write me down in history
With your bitter, twisted lies,
You may trod me in the very dirt
But still, like dust, I'll rise.
It seems to me that the best among poets is capable of speaking out more powerfully than the best among literary critics or theoreticians. These pour out their heart; those pin down their brains. Passion and piety often convinces us more quickly than any rosy rings of logic and rhetoric.

Good literature, therefore, educates the public sentiment with a gentle wave of the literary wand. People need to be educated all the year round. Any civilized society needs to develop a reading culture where ideas expressed by poets and writers are discussed so that one does not forget the injustice done by political regimes, races, religious groups or individuals upon other groups or individuals.  Keeping in mind the pains of evil helps us shun evil. So, one would expect such education to reduce crime and violence. One would expect politicizing an issue to solve some of our problems. One would expect that making laws against domestic violence against women would reduce such violence. The reality is that evil never dies and we are forced to fight it every day of our life with the best intention of a final victory, which (and I whisper this to you) is another fiction, another ideal we create to enhance our life. Of course, literature is concerned with denouncing such evil and sensitizing people to the need for common happiness. Any literature that deals with such social problems and issues and thinks about it seriously is good literature. And all good literature is optimistic, encouraging and warm with hopes of a better future.

Yet, we also know that, despite everything else, many writers and scholars are not placed in positions from where they can do anything much to improve unemployment and economic distress at home, which leads to such violence. They can at the most maintain their faith in good literature and keep shooing evil away with powerful voices that are heard by the masses. They can cultivate faith in synergetic action and in its ultimate positive effect, if not in eliminating crime and violence, at least in keeping these at bay. Once again, Maya Angelou beautifully expresses this act of eternally rising up against unending violence in the following lines:
Out of the huts of history's shame
I rise
Up from a past that's rooted in pain
I rise
I'm a black ocean, leaping and wide,
Welling and swelling I bear in the tide.
Leaving behind nights of terror and fear
I rise
Into a daybreak that's wondrously clear
I rise
Bringing the gifts that my ancestors gave,
I am the dream and the hope of the slave.
I rise
I rise
I rise.

I wish this Annual Conference of the Literary Association of Nepal a grand success. I hope it will encourage scholars to rise against evil, against sloth, against mediocrity to a loftiness of the spirit, to a profound sense of purpose and to an intellectual height that is visible from across all sorts of frontiers.

Thank you.




[1] Inaugural Address: Annual Conference 2013, LAN

Saturday, February 17, 2018

दोहोरो मापदण्डको प्रयोग

श्री श्रीओम श्रेष्ठज्यू
सम्पादक
मधुपर्क
गोर्खापत्र संस्थान
काठमाडौं

मिति : वैशाख २५, २०६८

विषय : दोहोरो मापदण्डको प्रयोग बारे ।

पत्रकारिताको नियम अनुसार कसैले यौटा पत्रिकामा कुनै व्यक्तिलाई आक्षेप लगाएर मानहानी वा चरित्रहत्या हुने गरी लेख छाप्यो भने यसरी मानहानी वा चरित्रहत्या गरिएको व्यक्तिले सोहि पत्रिकामा आफ्ना कुराहरू जनतालाई बताउन पाउने नैसर्गिक अधिकार प्रजातान्त्रिक अभ्यास हो । कात्र्तिक २०६६ सालको मधुपर्क (महाकवि लक्ष्मीप्रसाद देवकोटा शतवार्षिकी विशेषाङ्क) मा छापिएको कृष्ण अविरलको “महाकवि : उपेक्षा, असहयोग र लेखकस्व विवाद” शीर्षकको लेखमा मलाई लिएर केही चरित्रहत्या गर्ने खालका आरोप र मानहानीहरू परेका रहेछन् भन्ने कुरा २०६७ सालको चैत्रको आधाआधीपछि मात्र थाहा पाएँ र त्यसको लगत्तै त्यस लेखको प्रतित्रिया पनि लेखें । मैले लेखेको सो लेख तपाईंलाई वैशाख ९, २०६८ सालमा मधुपर्कमा छाप्न भनेर पठाएको हुँ । बीचका अनेकौं फोनवार्तापछि वैशाख २३, २०६८ का दिन तपाईंले फोनबाट बताउनु भयो, “हामीले सल्लाहा गर्‍यौं र तपाईंको लेख मधुपर्कमा नछाप्ने भयौं ।” मेरो जवाफ थियो, “म गोर्खापत्र संस्थानको निर्णयको कदर गर्छु, तर म तपाईंहरूको निर्णयसँग सहमत छैन ।”

तपाईंकै अनुसार मेरो लेख नछाप्ने कारण मध्ये प्रमुख कारण निम्न तीनवटा रहेको बुझेको छु :– १) लामो भयो (कम्प्युटरमा आठ पेज लामो थियो), २) त्रि.वि. केन्द्रीय अंग्रेजी विभागको पुरानो आगोको इतिहास दोहोरियो र ३) अभि सुवेदीका बारेमा भनिएका कुरा कडा भए । के मेरा बारेमा छापिएका कुरा कडा थिएनन् ? कृष्ण अविरलको लेख छाप्ने बेलामा यो कुरा किन सोचिएन ? जनताले पसिना चुहाएर कर तिरेर पालेको संस्थानले दोहोरो मापदण्ड अपनाएर मेरा बारेमा अनेकौं गलत प्रचार गरिसकेपछि मैले बोलेको सत्यले कुनै संरक्षित व्यक्तिको छवि धमिलिएला कि भनेर मेरा पक्षका तर्क छाप्न अस्वीकार गर्नु कति न्यायोचित हो ? यो भन्दा ठूलो विडम्बना के हुन सक्छ ? मेरा बारेमा अनेकौं गलत आरोप र चरित्रहत्या छाप्न तपाईंलाई जति सहज थियो मैले आफ्नो लेखमा बोलेको सत्य छाप्न तपाईं उति नै डराउनु भयो । यो अनैतिक पत्रकारिता हो ।

“तपाईंले तीललाई पहाड बनाउनु भयो” भनेर तपाईंले मलाई फोनबाट भन्नुभएको कुरा पनि ठीक होइन । दैनिक पत्रपत्रिकामा मृत्युको समाचार पढिरहेका व्यक्तिका लागि मृत्यु समाचार बन्न छोडेझैं एकआर्कालाई लुछिरहने कवि र साहित्यकारका ह्दयले गैंडाको छाला ओडिसकेका हुन्छन् । त्यसैले उनिहरूलाई मुङ्ग्रोको मारसमेत पुष्पस्पर्श लाग्दो हो । मेरानिम्ति कृष्ण अविरलको लेखमा मुङ्ग्रोकै प्रहार थियो । यो कुरा तपाईंले बुझ्नुभएन ।

र अन्त्यमा कुरा प्रष्ट होस् कि राष्ट्रको शिक्षा र संम्पति नाश्ने अधिकार कसैको नहुँदा नहुँदै पनि त्रि.वि. केन्द्रीय अंग्रेजी विभागको आगो केही होइन भन्नेहरूले यो कुरा बुझ्न बाँकी छ कि बार्‍ह वर्ष त के बीस वर्ष पछि पनि भावि पुस्ताले यसको कारण खोज्ने छन् । सत्यलाई जति टाउकोमा ठटाए पनि त्यसले टाउको उठाइरहने छ । सत्यको जीत सभ्य समाजको आवश्यकता हो ।

प्रजातान्त्रिक अभ्यासतिर तपाईंहरूको मन जाओस्,

मधुपर्कको शुभचिन्तक,

पद्म देवकोटा

Wednesday, January 10, 2018

From Setopul

I was delighted to see nature fight back
and reclaim a small portion of land from those
who had encroached upon her majestic flow.

The traffic upon the bridge was slow
for nothing would move ahead
the helmet lines were impatient but dead
upon their track as I stood on the pavement
clicking right and left. Below, the water still flowed.
Above, the blue sky was too deep to be mired
by the city haze. God! I heard right then
the wilds howl against human intelligence!


                                                                                January 10, 2018 8:25 p.m.